One of the problems facing the new Change Cycling Now group was the apparent lack of support for the group’s aims exhibited by current pro riders. At the press conference to launch its ‘Charter of the Willing’, there were no currently active pro riders present.

Both CCN founder Jaimie Fuller and ex-rider Paul Kimmage explained this absence by saying that, as far as Kimmage was concerned “riders were all just terrified” of the UCI, while Fuller said he “had tried very hard to get riders engaged.”

It’s clear that the CCN group needs the broad support of current pro riders to Dr Michael Ashenden’s new anti-blood-doping strategy. A system which if it was put in place “will guarantee the winner of the major Tours has not blood doped.” Ashenden was confident that riders’ group (CPA) president Gianni Bugno would be able to ‘sell’ the new anti-blood-doping regime to riders.

In the meantime, we asked CCN supporter Christophe Bassons if he thought that riders were “terrified” of the UCI, as Kimmage had suggested by way of explaining their absence from the CCN attendees in London.



“No… um… it’s not that they are terrified of the UCI, I think it’s complicated. What they say, what they think and what they do is always different for different riders. Personally, I don’t understand when they say they’re scared when we all talk about doping and yet at the same time not be terrified of the riders around them who are doping? And not scared of doping itself? We can’t pretend there’s no problem anymore because in the Tour there is still doping. For sure.”

Bassons continued: “From what I can see one of the problems with the riders is that the media turn riders into gods and the riders love that, they love it. And the riders are worried about saying anything or saying that they are not doping.

“Why? Because although riders are not doping ‘much,’ although they are not taking ‘heavy’ doping products, they are still worried that the because they are still taking medicines and infusions to help recovery under medical orders – they almost all do that – it’s medically OK, not forbidden. And if they are doing that and don’t admit to it and not facing up to the reality of that, they feel they are not really in a position to say that the riders around him are cheating.

“If they speak, they are taking a risk that they might later be exposed for taking medically authorised products and that they are the ones who are cheating.

“And that’s one of the reasons it’s hard to get riders to talk openly about doping. Also, riders want to hang on to their jobs because most of them don’t know how to do anything else and a rider is going to have a hard time with the UCI and other authorities like WADA or their Federations. I’m a bad example because I spoke up and I had to leave, I’m like an example of why you shouldn’t talk,” laughed Bassons.

The point surely is that, as ever, the problem of doping is not black and white and the issue of getting riders to speak up isn’t only rooted in a fear of the UCI.

At the CCN conference, Greg LeMond perhaps unwittingly put his finger on it: “I think all the riders want to know is that there’s a level playing field and that the rules will be really enforced and that they know the limits of what they will be competing in.”

And if the current crop of riders feel that progress is being made in an anti-doping direction, why, in the light of Bassons’ comments, would they want to get involved, no matter how laudable the project? What if, in the main, the current riders don’t care enough who the president of the UCI is so long as the anti-doping measures appear to be having an impact?

Related links



Greg LeMond for UCI president?



Change Cycling Now group unveils ‘Charter of the Willing’

This article is from

Cycling Weekly – In print and online, Cycling Weekly is the best source of breaking news, race reportage, reliable fitness advice, trustworthy product reviews and inspirational features. First published in 1891, the magazine has an amazing and unrivalled heritage, having been at the heart of British cycling for over 120 years.

Subscribe to Cycling Weekly in print » | Read the digital edition »

  • Misiu

    Anti-doping craze is the main cause that cycling is now in crisis. All those zero-tolerance, or nearly zero-tolerance measures only show that the current situation can’t be solved; there’s no sanity ’cause the medical considerations are overruled by zealous rhetoric. This is the force of the changing sentiment, which if you look closely tries to impose some dogmatic viewpoint in the name of “clean” sports. However, its legal standing is doubtful if not entirely illegal. Even by their own WADA Code, Art 17, IOC tried to remove, for example Armstrong’s bronze medal, way passed the statute of limitations of 8 years. So, what are they trying to do? If you call it justice then you’re closing your eyes to the obvious notion that sport authorities actually do their own share of cheating in the name of rooting out cheating.

  • Mike

    Thanks for taking the time to clarify the interview Kenny.

    Regarding medically authorised products, I was under the impression that any medication taken by a rider was “tested” or authorised by trained doctors to make sure it did not contain any banned substances that could lead to a positive.

    If cortisone is currently not banned for use out of competition then It can not be labeled doping. If the authorities believe it is a health hazard, or gives an unfair advantage, then they should add it to the banned list.

    As for sleeping pills or pain killers, over the counter brands are not on the banned list, so any rider refusing to take them is using there own free will chosing not to.

    I am 100% against doping and dopers but it is surely up to the UCI or the govorning bodies to decide if a medication is a performance aid, not the riders.

  • Kenny Pryde

    Mike, I should explain that Christophe didn’t really contradict himself, but that there’s a bit more nuance in what he said (and I clearly failed to translate).
    His point was that there was a difference between being ‘terrified’ or ‘scared’ and not wanting to invite any potential ‘hassle’ from any cycling authorities. Or media, for that matter. That’s not fear, that really just translates as ‘not worth the bother’.

    As far as taking medically authorised products goes. Well for a lot of people and riders that is a bit of a grey area – which he talked about in relation to cortisone. As far as I understand you don’t even need a TUE form to take a ton of cortisone out of competition so you can train like a monster on a high dose of cortisone – is that doping? Because ‘cortico’ is (medically) permitted? And we’ve had riders saying they wont take sleeping pills. Or pain killers in any dosage because that’s ‘doping’.

  • Sam

    Sorry to say this but there are too many confused and mixed messages coming out from the group and its supporters. All respect to Bassons but he retired as a pro in 2001. He’s not in a position to speak from the viewpoint of the current pro peloton – for that matter, nor does Fuller and certainly nor does Kimmage. The problem with having these guys give press conferences and interviews saying how the current pro peloton feel is that they – particularly Bassons and Kimmage – operate from a viewpoint that’s several years old. As has already been highlighted, its a real shame that none of the current riders were present, to educate the group’s members in how things really are now.

  • Mike

    So Christophe, nothing like contradicting youself is there?

    Not terrified of the UCI he says, then…”a rider is going to have a hard time with the UCI” Sounds like fear to me.

    Also, taking medicaly authorised products is not cheating. Unless of course the doctor is Mr Ferrari.