Five teams have been named as not initially meeting the Union Cycliste Internationale’s criteria set for ‘sporting value’ in the registration process for top-tier ProTeam status.

Ag2r La Mondiale, Geox-TMC, FDJ, Euskaltel-Euskadi and Europcar were all ranked outside the top 15 teams, according to the UCI’s system which ranks teams based partly on their riders’ sporting performances during the 2010 and 2011 seasons.

These five teams will now have their sporting achievements assessed in more detail by the UCI Licence Commission. If it is found that a squad does not meet the required grade, it risks having its ProTeam application or existing licence rejected. They would then be free to apply for second-tier Professional Continental status, again subject to meeting the criteria for that level.

The ranking system is based on results from the top 15 riders that will race with a given team during 2012. So if a rider has moved from team A to team B for 2012, his results count for team B.

ProTeams have automatic entry into the UCI’s WorldTour race calendar, which includes the spring classics and all three Grand Tours. Professional Continental teams still have a chance of entering these races on a wildcard basis.

In addition to meeting sporting criteria, teams must also meet the UCI’s ‘ethical, financial and administrative’ criteria before being awarded ProTeam status.

Although the UCI listed the top 15 teams in a statement on Tuesday, it did not place them in a ranked order. Teams ranked below 20th place were not listed but the UCI confirmed that they will not be considered for a ProTeam licence. They can apply for Professional Continental status if they wish.

One team notably absent from the top 20 is Project 1T4I, formerly known as Skil-Shimano.

Garmin-Cervelo and Movistar both appear in the top 15 of the list despite both squads being absent from the UCI’s initial list of 2012 ProTeam licences and applications. Also present in the top 15 is the Australian GreenEdge team, which will be a significant boost for the squad’s ProTeam aspirations.

Geox-TMC are in particular trouble after lead sponsor, shoe manufacturer Geox, pulled out of supporting the Spanish team in 2012. The squad rode as a Pro Continental outfit in 2011, but crucially failed to gain a wildcard place at the Tour de France. Juan Jose Cobo gave the team its only stand-out result of the season when he won the Vuelta a Espana overall.

Top 15 teams that have met UCI sporting criteria

Astana Pro Team

BMC Racing Team

Garmin – Cervélo

GreenEdge Cycling Team

Katusha Team

Lampre – ISD

Liquigas – Cannondale

Lotto Cycling Project

Movistar Team

Omega Pharma – Quick-Step Cycling Team

Rabobank

RadioShack – Nissan

Saxo Bank Sungard

Sky Procycling

Vacansoleil – DCM Pro Cycling Team

Teams ranked 16th to 20th

16. AG2R La Mondiale

17. Geox – TMC

18. FDJ

19. Euskaltel – Euskadi

20. Team Europcar

Related links

Geox quits cycling leaving Gianetti with no team

New WorldTour licence applications under scrutiny

  • Keeni

    It would be interesting if they could somehow incorporate doping offences into the weighting.

    If we assume that there may still be significant levels of doping in the peleton, then the clean teams may be being rewarded by losing their pro licences. What incentive is that? If a team is composed of riders who have always tested clean, but have performed less well than one that is full of past dopers or riders with suspect results, it doesn’t seem right that that shouldn’t somehow be taken into account.

    We need to find some way of rewarding teams and riders for staying clean. Perhaps this could be a way of encouraging teams to adopt and push for cleaner riders.

  • Rich_N_

    I’m surprised at Europecar, they have some class in that team, Tommy V immediately springs to mind – do 10 days in yellow count for nothing in this sport?