A definitive verdict on Alberto Contador’s case could be reached in a far briefer time than expected after the Spanish Cycling Federation (RFEC) reportedly invited WADA and the UCI to help them reach a joint decision on the Tour de France winner’s positive test for clenbuterol.

According to a report in Sunday’s El País newspaper, the RFEC has sent all the documentation for the case to both World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI). WADA has yet to respond, but the UCI has apparently said it will respond by January 23.

An unnamed source within the RFEC told El País, “The UCI and WADA took ages to decide that we were the ones who would have to handle the Contador case, so they should help us reach a verdict too.”

The unprecedented move, if confirmed, would eliminate the need for the case to go – as is widely expected – to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) should the UCI or WADA feel that the RFEC made the wrong decision about the Contador case. A decision from the RFEC was expected in early February.

“If the UCI or WADA, after studying the case, decide there has to be a penalty, then we’ll impose that penalty and if not, then not,” the Federation source stated.

“Either way, they can’t accuse us of being influenced by being overly patriotic, because if the UCI or WADA agree with our decision, then they won’t go to CAS.”

The UCI has already seen a lot of the original documentation given it sent it all to the RFEC when they opened a case on November 9, 2010.

However, since then there have been hearings at the RFEC, with Contador’s lawyers providing additional information in his defence to the RFEC four-person disciplinary committee overseeing the case. Presumably the UCI, or WADA have not had access to that additional information – until this latest development.

This article is from

Cycling Weekly – In print and online, Cycling Weekly is the best source of breaking news, race reportage, reliable fitness advice, trustworthy product reviews and inspirational features. First published in 1891, the magazine has an amazing and unrivalled heritage, having been at the heart of British cycling for over 120 years.

Subscribe to Cycling Weekly in print » | Read the digital edition »

  • Jon

    “Either way, they can’t accuse us of being influenced by being overly patriotic, because if the UCI or WADA agree with our decision, then they won’t go to CAS.”

    …therefore their decision is that the poor chap ate some tainted beef and surely everyone has a small trace of plasticisers in their blood once in a while. He’ll be back in this year’s grand tours showing the other riders a pair of heels considerably cleaner than his conscience or bloodstream.

  • theswordsman

    This is as brilliant a move as the Pellizotti lawsuit/deadline. Some would have second guessed any RFEC verdict – now they can’t. The UCI & WADA can’t wait 3 months to decide about CAS like the UCI is doing with Franco. Once the decision is reached, Contador will either be a free man or can immediately appeal to CAS.They also get payback on various members of WADA & the UCI who have slung mud or made threats, conveniently forgetting their own long delays and missed deadlines and complaining about the time the Competition Committee is taking. . At the same time, they’ve had more than a month to study the defense and request more information. I think someone in Spain has been reading Sun Tzu. Chapeau