The UCI ended one of its darkest weeks by giving its seal of approval to an independent commission to look into corruption allegations. It announced today that it will also suspend its defamation case against journalist Paul Kimmage pending the commission’s findings



Following an emergency Management Committee meeting today, President Pat McQuaid said in a communiqué, “We have listened to the world’s reaction to the Lance Armstrong affair and have taken these additional decisive steps in response to the grave concerns raised.”

He went on to say that the UCI today agreed to a “fully independent external commission to look into the various allegations made about UCI.” It said that the purpose of the commission would also be to find ways to “ensure that persons caught for doping were no longer able to take part in the sport, including as part of an entourage.”



Following next week, the UCI’s Management Committee will announce which sports body will nominate the commission’s members and start to agree on the terms.



The commission’s formation will appease several critics. Yesterday, the Dutch Federation’s president, Marcel Wintels wrote the UCI demanding a commission be formed. Wintels wrote, “More than ever, the UCI must dare to act forcefully.”



“It is Critical to everyone involved in the sport, including the UCI itself. An authoritative, independent international truth and inquiry committee with adequate legal measures can thereby serve as an important starting point. Only if we as an international cycling community are willing to take a very critical look to the ‘own system’, we will be able to build a clean, sportive and credible future.”



The International Association of Professional Cycling teams (AIGCP) and Association of Professional Cyclists (CPA) made similar calls.



On Monday McQuaid gave the UCI’s approval of the US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) Reasoned Decision, which stripped Armstrong of his seven Tour de France wins and banned him for life. It found the Texan doped throughout his career and had the help of a network, including Doctor Michele Ferrari and his teams, US Postal Service and Discovery Channel.



The testimonies gathered by the agency, 11 from Armstrong’s former team-mates, contained allegations of corruption. Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton claimed that Armstrong told them that the UCI helped cover up a positive EPO test from the 2001 Tour of Switzerland. Claims the UCI has always strongly denied.

This article is from

Cycling Weekly – In print and online, Cycling Weekly is the best source of breaking news, race reportage, reliable fitness advice, trustworthy product reviews and inspirational features. First published in 1891, the magazine has an amazing and unrivalled heritage, having been at the heart of British cycling for over 120 years.

Subscribe to Cycling Weekly in print » | Read the digital edition »

  • jimmy the fissh

    Apparently there is going to be a mass ride to Lausanne to demonstrate outside the UCI, start outside Abergavenny Rail Station 6th Nov. 10am Burnings in effigy of the main players in this unseemly mess on the previous night are optional … as transmitted via facebook and twit.(sic)

  • phil tregear

    well this is progress. I am pleased for Mr Kimmage. his was the first book I read on cyling. I then read armstrongs books and a variety of others. I was prepared to go along with the myth that doping was a personal choice and was essentially not harmful. Kimmage et al were right all along. I hope the rest of the press will now watch the UCI and this committee closely and critically. It is in no ones interests to let things get as crazy as they did in the bad years.
    On this note, I am surprised and saddened by Contadors comments. He is a powerful voice in the peloton . I hoped he would take a far stronger anti doping stance.

  • Terry

    So long as the McQrabbits are not left in charge of the lettuce patch then we can start afresh.