The International Olympic Committee (IOC) said today that new events could be included in the cycling programme at the 2012 London Olympics, but only if they replaced current ones.

The announcement makes it highly unlikely that we will see more medals awarded to women on the track in London 2012.

The decision of the IOC’s Executive Board came after cycling’s governing body, the International Cycling Union (UCI), requested more track events for women after the Beijing Games. But the UCI wanted more cycling events rather than a reshuffle, and President Pat McQuaid told Cycling Weekly that it would now be very difficult to make any changes.



“Firstly we’d have to sit down with the IOC and see how they expect us to achieve this,” McQuaid said from Moscow where he was watching the junior world track championships. “It would be very difficult to change anything.”



“You remember how federations reacted when the kilometre was dropped, no one would thank us for proposing the same thing.”



After the 2004 Olympic Games in Athens the UCI pulled the kilometre time trial and the women’s 500m time trial from the cycling programme in order to bring BMX in to the Games. The decision was met with an outcry after the multi-federation voting system used raised questions.

There are currently only three track medals available for female competitors (sprint, pursuit and points race) and seven for the male competitors. This compares to 24 and 23 events for male and female competitors in athletics (respectively), and 17 for both men and women in swimming.



Wary of the fall out from cutting any more events from the men’s track programme, McQuaid went on to say; “it wouldn’t take away from the sporting element to have more women’s events, but it would be of serious detriment to the sport if we had to take away from the men’s program, and there’d be ramifications all round.”



The IOC’s press release said:



The three Federations (FILA, FINA, and UCI respectively) submitted requests for new events. The EB informed them that this could happen, especially if the new events increase the participation of women at the Games and on condition that they replace events already on the programme. Additionally, current events can be replaced with new ones only if the total number of athletes is maintained.

  • Geoff Backshall

    Quote from Mr Coe this morning – ” I’m all for womens boxing being included, its all about equal opps for women!!!’ So does that not have equal value in cycling or do we clearly not have equal opps between sports? Perhaps if Seb got ‘on his bike’ we could have seen a different outcome.

  • Ed

    Why not just allow women to compete in the men’s events?
    Can’t get any more equal than that?

  • Geoff Backshall

    Strange how womens pole vault, womens hammer, womens triple jump and womens 3000m steeplechase have been included with no cost to mens T & F events! But suppose it evens out with the addition of BMX.

  • Les

    Seems a bit harsh – the swimmers get loads of chances for medals.