Tom Steels knows all too well how the blood and thunder of a sprint finish can cause a rider to act impulsively.

In 1997, the 25-year-old was riding his first Tour de France. He was the hottest property in bunch sprinting and he came wearing the famous black, red and yellow jersey as Belgian champion.

But a rush of blood to the head meant his Tour was over before the first week was out. The end of the sixth stage from Le Blanc to Marennes degenerated into the sort of untamed free-for-all we rarely see today. The era of the lead-out train was not yet fully established, it was a case of every man for himself.

It was a rocky sprint, with riders diving all over the place. Erik Zabel crossed the line first but was relegated to last place in the group for an irregular move. He cut across several other riders leaving a wave of disruption in his wake.

That was nothing compared to what Tom Steels did. A couple of hundred metres from the line, frustrated at being blocked, boxed in and cut up yet again, he sat up, pulled the water bottle out of its cage and flung it at the Frenchman, Frédéric Moncassin.

For that fiery moment, he was expelled from the race by the jury. It also earned him the nickname ‘Tom Bidon’ for a while. But, he says, it shaped the rest of his career. He came back to the Tour in 1998 and won four stages, then took three in 1999 and another two in 2000.

When he saw HTC-Columbia’s Mark Cavendish flick the Vs at his critics as he won a stage at the Tour of Romandy earlier this year, Steels empathised with the release of frustration.

“People don’t realise how much adrenaline takes over in the sprint,” says Steels, now 38. “All day, everything is building towards the last five or ten minutes of the stage. The whole day is about this moment.

“I can’t compare what Mark did to what I did. It was not the same - he didn’t do anything like throwing a bottle – but it was still a gesture that attracted some publicity. His team showed a strong reaction and decided to take him out of the race and that will make him stronger and help him channel that emotion in a different way.”

Steels smiles a sheepish smile as he thinks back to the rash petulance of his hot-headed moment.

“I was very frustrated, let’s say that,” he says. “A lot of things went on in that sprint that shouldn’t have happened. It was like it every day. I was 25, it was my first Tour and I wanted to win a stage but that is not an excuse. I don’t even remember why I did it. I threw the bottle and it hit Moncassin but I wasn’t aiming it at him. I wasn’t thinking. I did it out of frustration and immediately after the line, the anger was gone and the adrenaline was gone and I thought ‘What have I done?’

“I was taken out of the race and it was a big lesson for me. I never did anything like it again, that’s for sure. I learned that you have to concentrate on the race and take it when things do not go your way.”

Now working for the Belgian media, Steels is looking forward to the sprints and believes Cavendish will be the man to beat.

“Cavendish is the best,” says Steels. “When he is in form, he’s almost unbeatable. His team is so strong but the best thing about Cavendish is that his position on the bike is incredibly good. He gets very low and that makes it difficult for the riders behind him. Normally the other sprinters would fight to be on Cavendish’s wheel but it’s no use because you don’t get any shelter. It’s better to be another place back - but then you have to come from further behind, so that’s not easy either. It’s very difficult to beat him. Even when he’s not in the best form, he’s still very fast.

“I think the biggest challenge will be from Thor Hushovd and Tyler Farrar. Hushovd has had some problems too, with his crash. Farrar has had the smoothest season and he won a couple of stages in the Giro and he’s very consistent.

“It’s going to be a very interesting Tour because there is a chance the sprinters will have to be patient. If it is windy on Sunday some riders might miss the split. In Spa it won’t be a sprint, then there is the cobbles. The pressure to win a stage will be on the sprinters in the middle of the first week. Everyone wants to get their first win so it’s going to be interesting to see who copes with that the best.”

Tour de France 2010: Latest news



Tour teams presented in Rotterdam: What the riders said



Andy Schleck faces rough ride over Tour cobbles



Riis: Tour is the goal for Schlecks despite sponsor problems



Armstrong on Arenberg: There will be carnage



Cavendish set for green jersey battle at the Tour



Hunt and Lloyd look forward to making their Tour debuts

Tour de France 2010: Race guide



Tour de France 2010: Cycling Weekly’s coverage index



Official start list, with race numbers



Brits at the Tour 2010



Tout team guide



Tour jerseys: What they are and what they mean



Brits in the Tours: From Robinson to Wiggins

Tour de France 2010: Pictures



Tour team presentation, Rotterdam



Tour teams take to the cobbles: Photo special

 

This article is from

Cycling Weekly – In print and online, Cycling Weekly is the best source of breaking news, race reportage, reliable fitness advice, trustworthy product reviews and inspirational features. First published in 1891, the magazine has an amazing and unrivalled heritage, having been at the heart of British cycling for over 120 years.

Subscribe to Cycling Weekly in print » | Read the digital edition »

  • Lionel Birnie

    Lee, I will certainly take your point about Superconfex – they did indeed have a train for Van Poppel in the 1988 Tour.

    However, PDM did not lead out Kelly in anything like the same way. When Kelly rode for PDM, they were a team of all-rounders, with Alcala, Theunisse and Rooks going for the overall, and Kelly had long moved on from his field sprinting days. Kelly joined PDM in 1989 and had not won a bunch sprint for a number of years.

    Freddy Maertens may have had help but the sprints in the 70s were nothing like they are today.

    Yes, there may have been incidences of teams being organised for the sprints. Superconfex, you pointed out, Cipollini’s team was also getting itself together in the same way, but the pattern we have today was not fully established, so I stand by my point!

    Have a look at the YouTube clip of the 1997 stage in question – it’s a free-for-all. No one team is in control of the run-in or the sprint at all.

    Thanks for commenting. Enjoy the Tour.

  • Lee

    What do you mean the lead out trains were not fully established in Steel’s time? PDM and Superconfex (to name two) were all lead out teams for Kelly and Van Poppel respectively back in the late eighties and early nineties! In fact Van Poppel was given this type of help in the 1990 TdF. This was before my time, but didn’t Freddy Maertens have a team built around him to lead out the sprints. Trains are nothing new.