Reviewer: Cycling Active - Matt Levett; Photos by Daniel gould
28-Nov-2012 | 5 Reviews
Two winter-ready bikes from Dolan and Raleigh: Which is best?
In many respects, the Clubman has changed very little since its original incarnation at the hands of one of this country's most recognisable bicycle brands. In a contemporary context, its more sedate characteristics have steered it towards short, quick touring.
It doesn't quite have the bombproof qualities for a trans-global expedition but it's long and comfortable, quite strong, with good tyre clearance, full mudguards and mounts for racks. It's not the lightest bike you'll find but, built from Reynolds 520 chromoly, it's certainly no heavyweight.
You would have to ride a long way before you found anyone who wasn't beguiled by its simple, classic good looks. Coated in metallic dark blue with traditional Raleigh graphics plus matching steel mudguards and silver finishing kit, the Clubman is topped off with a tan Brooks Swift leather saddle and colour-matched 3D bar tape.
There is certainly enough here to please the retro crowd, but the Clubman is not a pastiche; it represents the continuity of an established lineage.
Solid spec
There is plenty of modern kit to complement the traditional frame and classic contact points. The Clubman's 10-speed set-up uses Shimano Tiagra shifters, chainset and front and rear derailleurs. The wheels comprise Weinmann TR18 rims on Tiagra hubs. Raleigh has stopped short of the full Tiagra groupset, fitting the Clubman with Tektro dual-pivot brakes.
The skinny steel tubing and relatively long wheelbase, derived from generous rear stays and a fairly dramatic rake on the fork, mean the Clubman offers a serene, silky smooth ride. It glides untroubled across the rougher sections of road. The only notable road noise comes from the mudguards, which, while easy to set up, have a tendency to rattle and buzz.
Although not the fastest out of the blocks, once up to speed the Clubman rolls along effortlessly. While the steel frame provides plenty of comfort, it is not unduly springy. The contemporary external bottom bracket pays dividends, giving plenty of rigidity.
So it's perfect for touring but, while it may be a bit laid-back for a super-quick club run, it has plenty to offer the enthusiast. It has the qualities required for those long winter miles and would make a great social rider. A patient, albeit undynamic climber, the Clubman is a nice cruiser and will eat up the miles. The geometry doesn't lend itself to sharp changes of direction but it is well balanced and swoops regally round bends.
The only real weak point in the Clubman's performance was the brakes, which were alarmingly weak. This is not the first time I've experienced this problem with Tektro calipers. They appear to be mechanically sound and rigid, so it may simply be a case of fitting better quality blocks.
Raleigh has successfully ridden a fine line between tradition and modernity with the Clubman. Its old-school qualities are not forced or contrived. It's a traditional steel frame, in the construction of which Raleigh has more form than most.
The Tiagra components offer modern efficiency, while their blue/silver finish and nice contours complement the classic frame. It's open to debate how and where old and new are best mixed. For instance, I would prefer a shallow drop bar for this kind of bike, but looks-wise the Clubman's traditional deep bars are spot-on.
Plenty of people are after decent steel frames, likewise Brooks saddles. With the Clubman, you get both and change from a grand. The price point makes it a viable second bike, though it's too beautiful to be called a winter hack. The bottom line is that this is a bike that ticks a lot of riding boxes: tourer, winter rider, and with its mudguards and rack mounts, a good all-week commuter. The only problem is you'll want to clean it every night.
Classic aluminium
Reynolds 520 chromoly
Shimano Tiagra with Tektro dual-pivot, long reach brakes
Brooks Swift
50, 52, 54, 56cm
3d forged
Shimano Tiagra hubs, Weinmann TR18 rims
http://www.raleigh.co.uk/
2012 SPECIALIZED PRO ROAD CARBON SHOE BLACK SRP £169.99
Websters...
Cycling newsletterSign up to our daily newsletter to get the latest news and reviews.
User reviews
Add your review
Malcolm McGregor
December 02 19:51
Suggest you read the current issue of your magazine on winter bikes. Scott Thwaites rides a machine made up of "old shimano" and comments in "What you say" suggest that steel frames and bits & pieces are adequate for most of us as well as full mudguards. You at Cycling Weekly must think we are all made of money. Cyclo Cross ! treat yourself to a cross bike. Sportive ! likewise. It seems we need a machine for every discipline. I have an income of £14,600.00 (state & work pension) how can I afford £1500.00 for a winter bike ? Perhaps you should get rid of the Tech Team and employ an economist to advise those of us on low incomes how to afford the latest gear. A couple of good journalists also to report on the racing scene.
leroche
December 05 16:59
I earn £120,000 per year before bonuses and I for one wouldn't be seen dead on a training bike that cost a mere £1,500. How anyone would want to ride ''old shimano'' is quite frankly beyond me. Deep section carbon wheels are de rigeur for my weekly race around Richmond park where I destroy all these so called clubmen with their mudguards...........
Edmundo
December 09 22:11
Old shimano? It only lasts 4 years! The good ride of a steel frame, rubbish, once a week around a park with deep wheel, who are these people?
John
December 12 13:14
the trouble with readers' comments is that i never know if they are joking or not. Assuming not.. well done to all you big earners out there - carry on and buy your disposable bikes... most of the fashion and fad concious memebers of our society will go onto the next trendy thing long before they have got the full use from whatever exotic machine they buy but for the rest of us... Steel frames are a safer bet when buying second hand. They may be a little heavier but the better quality tubes are within a knat's digit - unless you go carbon-fibre. This just looks like a throw-away bike. we have had to get used to the idea of the componenets not lasting but now it appears that the frames are going the same way. As far as being ashamed to be seen on last years model... well, i never worried. if i was good enough to get to the front then it did not matter much what year the bike was made. I bet Team Sky could ride a butcher's bike faster than most of us who are on this years latest carbon miracle. - feel free to discuss....
Edmundo
December 15 18:46
Either way, its 2012, glue and burnt plastic makes a good frame, not romantic or nostalgic, but workhorses like this are tougher than people seem to think ( i have a giant cfm from 93 that has had hiddious abuse) and if, like me, your out four times a week in salt and dirt on country lanes in the dark, you get home and throw it in the shed, mudguards, carbon fiber (or a disposable alloy) frame and campagnolo are a must. With all due respect Malcom, i don't think think the review was for you personally.